Recent comments in /f/just_post

cowloom wrote

I'm non-binary, so that means I'm definitely not straight (M<->F). But I don't think I can be called gay either (M<->M || F<->F)... gotta be honest, I'm just as confused as you are.

Just kidding, we made our own labels a while ago. I am Trixic! (NB<->F || NB<->NB)

2

underscores wrote

Reminds me of how youtube's autocaptions just put [_] for everything, as if deaf people can't handle swearing or slurs, but everyone else can.

I think you're better off not having slurs, but if it's there in one format it should be in the other. If you do censor it at least do it where it's clear what specific word isn't being said.

4

twovests OP wrote

Not on Linux- the accessibility scene is pretty abysmal and even then, the screen readers I used didn't have OCR. (Plus there's OCR taking more battery, which isn't immaterial)

I think I don't consider it a dilemma, but I am imagining other people see it as such and I am trying to inquire about how people internalize it / think about alt text.

I do think censoring the slur in the screenshot is the way to go (and so also noting the pixelated and implied slur in the alt text)

4