Recent comments in /f/technology

twovests OP wrote

7

emma wrote

9

flabberghaster wrote

100%. They bill it as "you don't have to pay a guy to run your on prem hardware for you" but you absolutely do not save money once you've scaled to the point you need a few machines.

And by that point, your software is probably so tied in to proprietary Amazon stuff that they've got you in a vice.

It's the same model as Oracle: oh we're so easy to use and friendly, and we have all these great Oracle specific features, go ahead and use them! 😊 but then they have you locked in and they can just start squeezing.

3

twovests OP wrote

Going "your personal blog" mode: I don't like the bespoke names like "Route 53", but at least a lot of AWS makes sense? There are very few things I've come across (as someone toes-deep into AWS) that seem like a horrible engineering mistake made at Amazon.

If I were to build an intranet for the internet and divide everything into tiny little separately-billable services, I'd do it a lot like this.

4

twovests OP wrote

everyone laughed at me when i said i had an idea for interactive visualization tools which work up to 5 spatial dimensions :(

that would have been great for manifold learning, because usually you only work with 2 or 3 spaces.

if the true shape of something is 10 dimensional or less, you can explore that by umap'ing it to 5 dimensions or less

alas

2

Ruby wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by neku in The Juicero of Bikes by voxpoplar

Very different kind of product but i think the thing that most recaptured the magic of Juicero was Quibi imo. In terms of like, massively overfunded thing that everyone immediately recognized as a stupid idea and was widely mocked throughout its short existence.

2