dimes you out to the feds for violating the computer fraud and abuse act of 1984 for accessing my computing device without authorization or by circumventing access control mechanisms without the consent of the owner of such device
I suspect she's trying the Starmer playbook (which is the standard dem one). Just try to not say anything that gets you a negative news cycle and be the alternative while you let your opponent be horrible.
For this she needs to not piss off the big donors or corporate class, and they tend to be pro Zionism. The fact that most people aren't is one thing, but the fact that the news media, advertisers, and big donors tend to be means if she says she supports reigning in Israel's actions, that's gonna create a news cycle or risk turning off the donors.
This is the same reason dems never do good things. M4A is popular among the populace, but unpopular among the rich donors, and if they went for it their more conservative opponents would get the donations instead if them and then beat them.
He's not wrong. Obviously trump is worse. We know this. But I'm not voting for genocide.
Fuck the democrats for playing chicken every four years with the presidency. Why are they engaging in this deeply unpopular war and then making it everyone else's fault when they lose? Fuck them.
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to ｐｏｓｔ by hollyhoppet
Loving the new postwave aesthetic