emma

emma OP wrote

Reply to comment by neku in i deleted my mozilla account by emma

google doesn't need to use chrome to push ads and stuff. they have a vast collection of services that are unavoidable and which people actually use. mozilla, on the other hand, has only one product with wide reach: firefox. so it stands to reason that if mozilla's gonna do something nasty with their ad business, it has to be firefox users who become the victims of it.

i believe this is why mozilla builds support for crapgpt into firefox, and google doesn't build it into chrome. people will simply get that when they use google search anyway.

1

emma OP wrote

Reply to comment by twovests in i deleted my mozilla account by emma

my perception of brave is very negative due to the people in charge, so i don't think i'll be switching to that.

i've used mozilla browsers since 2003 (mozilla suite, which became seamonkey, then firefox 1.0), and it's very upsetting seeing what we've lost, and all the flavours of chrome we're left with.

5

emma wrote (edited )

Reply to comment by nitori in i have a confession to make by hollyhoppet

i made simple android ones in uni, and i think i could be good at if i wanted. but i just have a complete lack of interest in it.

on the other hand, if i were interested in making any app for anything, then maybe the postmill api wouldn't be so shit.

4

emma wrote

i believe, based on my legal experience (eight ace attorney games, and i've followed the lawsuits by this guy who cheats in donkey kong), that this is a patent issue, not a copyright one.

so, first, you need to know the patent being violated. i believe it to be this one: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20210349631A1/en

then you need to email steve jobs and tell him that this scummy outfit is misappropriating his invention.

3