i havent read this yet but i was going to reply to your first christmas comment with soem thing like I hope you get better soon. or This made me sad to read,. but that probablly would have made you a lot worse, so im glad i didnt say these things
Another piece of evidence proving my belief that economics is a completly fake and yogshit "field". The other professors and guys they cited in the article all basically said Yeah what he did wasnt actually bad, we all do that shit, but he should have put a foot note saying that he was making every thing up, like the rest of us do. Fuck economists 🖕🖕
yeah, when i said "logical" i was thinking more along the lines of , oh the tree coverage is so staggeringly high for a relatively small country because they planted a bunch postwar to reconstruct with, that makes sense, and the population is so concentrated in urban centers (92% live in cities !) that they didnt need to clear trees to spread out much, this makes sense to me too. but the workings of capitalism and cheap imports are, not very logical at all i think lol
"couldnt u jst use letter box ed for that " pointless performative nothing application i dont approve of it + the users there are mean to people who are stupid (me) + i wouldnt get to play my favourite toy excel
Japan has too many trees, so we turned them into crayons
I_got_killed_one_time wrote
Reply to please select one of the numbered options on my to do list to choose what i get rid of next by neku
SKULL BONE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!