Recent comments in /f/ask
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
The full context of the first was like "It gives us the same strange out of place feeling as when we see an actor who we can't quite place how we know them."
The second clause describing the actor feels redundant to me, it feels very awkward. Having the pronoun for the same subject in there feels weird. "An actor that ..." Means that ... Is specifically referring to the actor. Then we have "... we don't know where we know them" feels like a whole new sentence with its own subject and object. It feels unrelated to me. The them is redundant, to me.
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by SWORDSCROSSED in Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
Yeah I edited it. I messed that up. I changed it to "a type of fruit that we don't know where is from"
Is that any less ungrammatical to your ear?
Dogmantra wrote
Reply to Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
I think this has existed for a while, at least when I do it it mostly comes from restructuring the sentence halfway through, yknow when you start going without knowing exactly how you're going to finish?
e.g. in your examples, it would be "a type of fruit that [pause] we don't know where it comes from"
hollyhoppet wrote
Reply to Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
naw, i've heard it all my life
SWORDSCROSSED wrote
Reply to Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
I think your second example sounds very wrong to me, I’d have to reword it like “a type of fruit we don’t know the origin of”
twovests wrote
Reply to Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
Can you give an example in a full sentence? (gen)
oneviolence wrote
Drink Sprite. For Your Wounds.
devtesla wrote
Do you know of such a thing? Asking for a friend....
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
No one knows how to play until they learn
twovests wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
(i don't actually know how to play dnd or rifts)
Depends on the answer to the "potion of healing" question
hollyhoppet wrote (edited )
I think there's an important distinction that needs to be made here based on the other conversation: a potion of healing will prevent scarring for a wound that it heals, but it won't remove an already-existing scar. Otherwise you wouldn't have burly scarred warriors adventuring all over the place.
And if it can't do that, let alone restore lost limbs, I doubt it could undo circumcision. That said, I'm sure a potion that could do so can be researched without too much trouble.
Dogmantra wrote
Reply to comment by nomorepie in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
punk fighter with a face full of piercings getting increasingly annoyed at having to get them redone after every adventure
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
we are playing rifts in hob chat if you're serious
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by neku in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
Well like if you get severe burns over a large part of your body, it will "heal" in that it'll scar over, but it won't be normal skin. A potion of healing will make it normal skin.
I'm not sure, to /u/nomorepie's point, if that means say, if you have a scar, if it would cause that to undo. I think that's kind of the whole ballgame here.
neku wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
sure but your body will heal that normally. it won't heal a lost limb or foreskin. that said a potion won't leave a scar, while normal healing will...
nomorepie wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
Does it heal only fresh wounds? Like if it closed up and scarred over properly I wouldn't think it would register as a wound tbh. Same thing with piercings, body mods etc
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by neku in Do you think a potion of healing would undo circumcission? by flabberghaster
But like if you lose a patch of skin on your arm due to it burning or something, it will grow back. I don't see why growing back skin on your dingus would be different from on your arm.
neku wrote (edited )
in my mind a potion of healing doesn't heal missing limbs or body parts. so i wouldn't think so. but if you get a hold of a potion of healing and it magicks a foreskin onto ya i would happily eat my words
twovests wrote
Do you have a DnD group that's looking for members?
sarah wrote
Reply to comment by rain in Tech Support: If I have my name on my signal account, does it show it to everyone I add on there? by flabberghaster
your profile (name, picture, "about") is visible once you've sent the first message (or reply)
sarah wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Tech Support: If I have my name on my signal account, does it show it to everyone I add on there? by flabberghaster
yes, they will.
your name, about text and profile picture are visible to your signal contacts — username and phone number aren't.
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by rain in Tech Support: If I have my name on my signal account, does it show it to everyone I add on there? by flabberghaster
No my concern is that if I add a stranger, using an account name rather than my phone number, but I have my real name in my profile (which I set so that people I know will know who's messaging them), will the stranger I add also get my real name?
rain wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by twovests in Tech Support: If I have my name on my signal account, does it show it to everyone I add on there? by flabberghaster
I think it shows your name and profile picture, but not your phone number.
Correct; it’s actually best to think of the name field as “displayname”. If that’s not what you want you can change it.
Interestingly, it also doesn’t reveal your username, and allows you to change usernames without losing already existing chats. So a trick I’ve used is to change my username to something random, give it to someone in order to establish a conversation then change my username back. Now I have a conversation where neither of us can see the phone # or username of the other.
I think if they have your phone number in their contacts, Signal will add that to the Signal contact, and so someone can find your phone number by adding every phone number to their contacts
Yes, but I handle this by not allowing signal to access my contacts. It’s worth checking out your various ai and assistant settings on your phone as well but that’s a bit of another topic.
Edit: I just realized in the final paragraph the concern was other people finding out you were on signal by them giving signal access to their contact book. As I understand it, if you were trying to hide that you have a signal account from people who would have your phone number this would be genuine concern. Personally I don’t use my primary phone number for signal which makes this a non-issue. If you don’t want your normal contacts knowing you use signal then you should get a second number and register signal to it instead.
twovests wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Is this a new speech construction? It feels off to me. But I keep hearing it especially in the last couple of years. by flabberghaster
So I don't know grammar good enough to know what a clause is, and I grew up where people didn't always speak "standard" english in the first place, so grain of salt, but it sounds fine to me.
I'd say "where we know them from" but that only sounds a smidge more standard