Recent comments
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Bernie Sanders released this video, what do you think? --- "I disagree with Kamala’s position on the war in Gaza. How can I vote for her?" Here is my answer: by twovests
No that's who I mean. Labour won in Parliament by purging the left, and then just sitting there and letting the conservative party shit itself.
twovests OP wrote
Reply to hammers to your brain, algorithmic feeds, datura, and anime gacha games are all the same thing by twovests
"hey twovests, look at this meme i f-"
"no thanks, i don't want second-hand algorithmic feed"
this is how you can be if you are willing to alienate people in your life
hollyhoppet OP wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in I'm going to hide the jstpst.net gitlab repo for a little while while I'm on the hunt for jobs by hollyhoppet
lmao i guess i can unsticky this since twovests manages all the code now and i don't know where they keep it or even if any modifications are being applied to vanilla postmill anymore
twovests OP wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Bernie Sanders released this video, what do you think? --- "I disagree with Kamala’s position on the war in Gaza. How can I vote for her?" Here is my answer: by twovests
Asking genuinely-- who is Starmer? I tried googling it and only get the recent UK PM, who I figure isn't the same playbook.
In either case, I really still get the impression that she could've won over more support than she'd lose if she, e.g. just allowed the one Palestinian speaker at the DNC.
flabberghaster OP wrote
Reply to comment by oneviolence in Remember the Christian God cannot see below the earth so it doesn't count as murder if it's underground. by flabberghaster
You'll have to ask /u/500poundsofnothing about that one
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Bernie Sanders released this video, what do you think? --- "I disagree with Kamala’s position on the war in Gaza. How can I vote for her?" Here is my answer: by twovests
I suspect she's trying the Starmer playbook (which is the standard dem one). Just try to not say anything that gets you a negative news cycle and be the alternative while you let your opponent be horrible.
For this she needs to not piss off the big donors or corporate class, and they tend to be pro Zionism. The fact that most people aren't is one thing, but the fact that the news media, advertisers, and big donors tend to be means if she says she supports reigning in Israel's actions, that's gonna create a news cycle or risk turning off the donors.
This is the same reason dems never do good things. M4A is popular among the populace, but unpopular among the rich donors, and if they went for it their more conservative opponents would get the donations instead if them and then beat them.
cute_spider wrote
Reply to comment by oneviolence in Remember the Christian God cannot see below the earth so it doesn't count as murder if it's underground. by flabberghaster
They can see the act but only God can determine murder.
twovests OP wrote
Reply to comment by flabberghaster in Bernie Sanders released this video, what do you think? --- "I disagree with Kamala’s position on the war in Gaza. How can I vote for her?" Here is my answer: by twovests
Yeah; I agree a lot with what Bernie has to say (and I wish we had gotten him in 2016 or 2020) but this is how I feel too. I don't think it's exaggeration to say that this election is existential for me personally, but even then, I couldn't vote for her. I ended up voting for Clauda de la Cruz as a protest vote.
I live in a normally-blue state that could feasibly swing red by the protest vote. If dems lose easy blue states to protest votes, maybe they'll start meeting voters where they're at, instead of bowing to AIPAC and evangelical Christians.
I can't stop thinking about how many votes Harries left on the table. We saw the Uncommitted National Movement do a huge amount of organizing during the primaries, mobilizing otherwise-unlikely voters in amazing numbers in swing states, preparing easy wins for Harris on a platter when she took the candidacy. She threw away hundreds of thousands of unlikely voters -- and likely the election -- because she loves genocide too much.
The "less genocide is still genocide" argument is reductionist but true. I think we're going to have four years of seeing what "more genocide" looks like. Even if the Dems go way left, the issue might be moot by 2028.
oneviolence wrote
Reply to Remember the Christian God cannot see below the earth so it doesn't count as murder if it's underground. by flabberghaster
What about non Christian Deities?
Ruby wrote
its a good song
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to Bernie Sanders released this video, what do you think? --- "I disagree with Kamala’s position on the war in Gaza. How can I vote for her?" Here is my answer: by twovests
He's not wrong. Obviously trump is worse. We know this. But I'm not voting for genocide.
Fuck the democrats for playing chicken every four years with the presidency. Why are they engaging in this deeply unpopular war and then making it everyone else's fault when they lose? Fuck them.
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to I'm going to hide the jstpst.net gitlab repo for a little while while I'm on the hunt for jobs by hollyhoppet
Is it still hidden
oolong wrote
as foretold by justus postus
flabberghaster wrote
Reply to https://jst.doded.mil/jst/login by twovests
that link is deprecated. please use /f/just_warcrimes instead
nitori wrote
Reply to https://jst.doded.mil/jst/login by twovests
I disagree
neku OP wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in me: "i'm free any time tomorrow!" them: "what time is best for you?" me: "we could do 10 am?" them: "no later that day would be better" me: "what time is better" them: "2 pm" 🫠 by neku
i mean i wasnt glued to whatsapp the entire time. but like, my understanding of the social contract around setting an appointment time is that saying "i'm free any time tomorrow" is yielding control of the appointment time to the other party. saying "what time is good for you?" is returning the ball back to me. ok. a little impolite to try and outpolite me imo. it's like saying "after you" when i'm already holding the door open for you. i offer a time and two hours later they say no let's do 2 pm. like just take my politeness! it's social lubricant! theyre de-lubricating my social encounter!
neku wrote
Reply to comment by Ruby in https://jst.doded.mil/jst/login by twovests
just_dode
twovests wrote
Reply to me: "i'm free any time tomorrow!" them: "what time is best for you?" me: "we could do 10 am?" them: "no later that day would be better" me: "what time is better" them: "2 pm" 🫠 by neku
this seems a lot worse for having had taken place over two and a half hours
twovests wrote
this is smart and true. they killed socrates to make way for you
Ruby wrote
Reply to https://jst.doded.mil/jst/login by twovests
me when i just doded
twovests wrote
Reply to Considering........ A Jorking Sesh..... by oneviolence
you gotta do it at least three times a day
neku wrote
Reply to It's strange how so many philosophers do not live up to their name. Lacan is not at all laconic, and Hume is not the least bit humorous. by flabberghaster
hegel had notoriously weak pelvic floor muscles
cowloom wrote
Reply to Ascurcia by Artisan by hollyhoppet
That sure was some music (I mean this in a good way)
cowloom wrote
wow, fantastic
twovests wrote
Reply to Weeee, are the posters, my friends... And weeeeee'lll keep on writing, on-line by flabberghaster
songs if they were good!