jef bnezos only acutoually has like, maybe a billion or several billions in liquid funds!! stop asking him to pay taxes.

Ehhh, white supremacists were some of the earliest adopters of the internet. The problems with Parler, Gab, etc. aren't new. I don't think removing Section 230 will help anyone.

This person is arguing we should get rid of automated moderation is stone-cold stupid. There's more evils to be moderated than just nazis. Why should we subject humans to child pornography when we have automated tools that can identify a broad class of child pornography? And what's to stop the "good-faith human moderators" from being bad? Employing automated moderation is a necessary step of good-faith measures.

This person acknowledges that ISPs, etc. should still be seen as service providers, but the reality is that Twitter, etc. are practically utilities for common people nowadays. The common citizen doesn't have the ability to call a press conference or send mass mailings on a whim (like Trump does).

I think the root of this evil lies in the engagement and marketing algorithms that big sites use. It's like the Paperclip game about an AI that optimizes paperclip production (at the cost of everything else) https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/index2.html

I almost feel like I'm missing some big parts of the argument here

the good thing about new runescape is that it has so many things that make training faster and less click intense. you can click it, like, once a minute

but it's still very bad

sadly no

note: i am actually a long-con bad-faith troll trying to get everyone to make a wiki of arguments and explanations, but disagreements over these will sow discord and division in our community

pls ban hollyhoppet

yea

this did not hpapen in 1984

(orwel did not write anyhting else)

could u imagine tho if we were the only site he could message on

so much power

god fuck the GOP

gayyyyyyyyyyy

bepis conch

FWIW there was definitely spam before, but that subforum got spam p much immediately. my bad ;(

admission: awhile ago i made f/ enn ess eff double-u and it got bots immediately

f/nobodyseesfriendlywaluigi

so i renamed it

Ahhh that makes sense, I am indeed using Ubuntu.

But, looking at the top playercount list, it seems I'm just lucky with the games I choose ;o!

https://www.protondb.com/explore?page=0&sort=playerCount

just post good post

silly and good

Ah is this the case? Unfortunate :(

I've not had this experience, but I've not played many games with Proton. Primarily just Project Winter and Stardew Valley, both of which worked perfectly with no setup whatsoever.

Perhaps it can be remedied with some kind of community-built settings database, a-la the Steam Controller?

All jokes aside, have you tried Steam Proton? I don't think there'll ever be a "year of the Linux desktop" but wow I can play so many games on Linux now

!! we are happy to hear you are recovering. sending u energy like anime spirit bomb

it's a distributed datastructure that is kind of interesting

if u buy enough gpus u get a blockchain token

yues

TIL that bias lighting has a name and has actual benefits!!

Also I do indeed feel this satisfaction, thank you for sharing~

backup first pls... too many good postes;;...

This feels like the same kinda hype Skyrim had in 2011... And Skyrim was CHOCK FULL o glitches

So, we have moderation logs, but AFAIK they don't mark edits. This is good for, say, scouring the site of spam links or porn posts or whatnot.

For the health of a larger site run by postmill, I'd say it's definitely bad. Forum mods should not be able to edit someones post. Admins would have the power but probably shouldn't.

Not to be a "muh freeze peach" chud, but I think it's plainly icky for mods and admins to edit posts, even in jest. The only exceptions I could see are syntactically-clear mod edits, a-la "USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST".