We're insufferable too but you don't see us making our terrible inside jokes everyone else's problem.

a society without tony hawk's pro skater is not a society worth living in

the advances in scary science...

The technology for posting about lunch was right at our fingertips this whole time. Makes you think

Bet it felt so good to write that

i mean they do that too, it's a multi-pronged approach.

🤓

It just shows ***** for me?

$200 is peanuts to a gambling addict. I remember back in the 80s I had a relative who bought $100 in lotto tickets every week. It’s scary to think how much she would have spent in a casino.

my password is actually weak2, so i ll be good

Yeah, that's another issue. I was looking at this as "their business model is to lose money to get people hooked, but if I don't get hooked, I'm just taking money from an evil business."

But that ~$200 loss is subsidized by the people who do get hooked. The fact that they offer $200 in bonus bets means they're expecting to extract at least $200 from every person who takes the bet to break even, which is a mind-boggling amount to spend to gamble.

At least at the site I'm looking at, this doesn't seem to be the case. But yeah, "bet $1000 get $200 in bets" doesn't make it worth it to me. Especially with a sublinear cost function (i.e. $1000 is worth more than half of $2000 for me).

Yay, gambling!

Oh wow, I thought professional gamblers operated mostly in the place where skill and knowledge is useful, like poker or investing. I can't see one making a living on $200 promos.

The TOS, at least in my state, lacks an arbitration clause, which is a huge surprise.

There's something called a rainbow table which is used for hacking. The idea is to save all the password hashes you crack, to reuse later.

Luckily, Postmill salts password hashes. Even in the event of a breach, a rainbow table could not be used on them.

(That said, if your password is weak, it'll still be easy to crack)

Very good

i love corals theyre so pretty :)

if getting whitelisted did anything, they wouldn't let you do it.

they're just trying to corral our energy back in to the system.

I upvoted you because in general I agree.

If I did do it, it would be with the intent of doing a write up on the experience. Probably won’t because I have more than enough on my plate right now, but if I had the extra free time it would make an interesting post.

there is a button that says "ban forever and ever from every site not just this one" and it is right next to da reply button..........

You're whitelisted :-)

bah everybody can get on the whitelist

I wanna get to the BLACKLIST >:O

I think you should not give these casinos one red cent, you're not gonna beat the house. Everyone who gambles thinks they might, and if they were right, there would be no casinos.

If you gamble, go in expecting to lose. If you're doing it for fun, then have fun. But you're giving money to some of the worst and most rapaciously exploitative businesses in America.

i'm pogging so hard about this lol. even if you're not personally interested in the archive, expect the quality of video essays about games to increase across the board as this tool matures

This is literally how professional gamblers do their thing lol. One of the strategies is to drift from "free money" deal to "free money" deal and take advantage of it without falling for the addiction trap. The thing is you only get those promos once per place. If you're going to do it read the terms of service very carefully to make sure there isn't a catch.