nitori
nitori wrote
Reply to comment by anethum in more like crap peepee t by flabberghaster
I didn't realize until you said it just now
I upvoted the post anyway lol
nitori wrote
Reply to RSS/atom feed issue by voxpoplar
nitori wrote
Reply to by !deleted495
now we're fishing
nitori wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by !deleted495 in by !deleted495
It also means you're limited to 3 posts per hour, and you can't create new forums or send PMs
nitori wrote
Reply to comment by nomorepie in idea: caramelized onion pecan pie. the filling is made of caramelized onion by twovests
username does not check out
nitori wrote
Reply to The web is ENSHITTIFIED... I wish it were more like the 00s, where there was... *Looks at screenshots* Oh no. *Flipping through screenshots* Oh nooooooooo. (CW: discussion of grooming / csam) by twovests
The whole web is a mistake. Let's go back to gopher
nitori wrote
Reply to Your least favorite desserts GO! by Moonside
Anything with cherry
nitori OP wrote
Reply to Messing with `network.http.referer.spoofSource` in your browser's about:config will impact (un)pinning of posts in Postmill by nitori
u/emma I wonder if we actually need to use the browser's Referer for the (un)pin function. Wouldn't it be better if the user gets redirected to the forum's page always anyway so they can see clearly the effect of the pin?
nitori wrote (edited )
Historical messages are not available on this device
nitori OP wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in HTTP 1.2 Released with Improved Support for Hierarchies and Text-Menu Interfaces by nitori
There's a Medium article I read which is probably AI-written stating that "HTTP/1.2" was made in 2009 lol
nitori OP wrote
Both Basic and Digest access authentication are improved to provide a better native-looking browser-based experience than form-based authentication.
Oh how I wish we got Cookie-based authentication implemented straight in HTTP itself instead of having to use forms...
The spec has been updated with a new set of accepted headers - and in a break with past tradition, any header not in the list of accepted headers is to be rejected by a compliant server.
Wait that just breaks backwards compatibility with HTTP/1.1, how can this joke protocol be 1.2 lol
nitori OP wrote
Actually perhaps we might not need compression for the response headers even, but some sort of ETag.. There'd be like a Headers-ETag
for the unique value and Headers-ETag-Names
(I'm not satisfied with this name but can't think of something better) for the list of redundant headers to not be repeated in subsequent requests
nitori OP wrote
ZUN commented about it! https://twitter.com/korindo/status/1826878435597467689
nitori wrote
Reply to comment by oneviolence in MRW i see a /u/FlabberGhaster post by oneviolence
Yeah we're no longer in the ancient version of Postmill
But even then you wouldn't be able to upload that enormous GIF here anyway because the file size limit is 2 MB :P
nitori wrote
Reply to MRW i see a /u/FlabberGhaster post by oneviolence
nitori wrote
Reply to Plok! SNES Music - Beach by hollyhoppet
Can't believe this chiptune album comes with a video game
nitori wrote
Reply to comment by emma in Crouton Art by astaguru
contemporary crouton
So.. burger buns? :3
nitori wrote
Reply to what if the torment nexus was a puppy :3c by twovests
Give it dentastix, the puppy will never finish it >:)
nitori wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Ongoing list of improvements to make when I get around to it :3 by twovests
nitori wrote
I'm not sure about doing a warrant canary tbh. It's going to be another responsibility to keep up on a regular basis (Raddle updated their canary monthly before they've made it irregular, and other companies do it every 6 months). Updating the canary itself is not the hard part (until you get an actual gag order), but rather remembering to do it lol. If you forget, users might think jstpst got compromised when it's not
If you're going to do it anyway, it might be a good idea to have at least one admin who is outside of 14 Eyes doing the cryptographic signing, so that a government agency from those countries couldn't just force an admin here to update the canary
nitori wrote
Reply to Plain rice by nomorepie
nitori OP wrote
Reply to comment by hollyhoppet in Mystia Izakaya anime is real! by nitori
:O You play it?
nitori wrote
Reply to I think jstpst.net should offer to upload my posts to OneDrive®, and if I don't accept right away, then it should ask me again in a day or two until I relent「あぁ」 by emma
OneDirection