what

a good cuck is not just dominant, but also has all the skills of a gameshow host. this property is associative

i've been rolling this around in my head all day and still have no idea what the hell you're trying to say lmao. this post is art

i.... i think i kinda sorta get it (pls don't get mad at me for trying to make sense of the nonsense)???

i think the second part of the statement is easier; like, i can make the leap on how someone could insist that "being dominant" and "having all the skills of a gameshow host" have associative property (though it's not true? i can accept a skilled gameshow host necessarily being dominant but not really the opposite). connecting it to the "cuck" part is an even bigger leap for me though

if this didn't help i hope i made it more confusing

somehow i missed all the replies to this post

while usually i am insanely rambling, i meant everything i said in this post in particular

have you ever seen a cuck in action? they're always seeking participants, directing the scene, making things move, congratulating contestants, giving rewards (snacks at the end), etc.

right?

now think about bob barker's famous personality. compare and contrast

now, in addition to all this, i think this counts as being dominant. but in a secret way

sorry i missed this earlier!!

what i mean is that a skillful cuck has all the skills needed to host a game show

but also, a game show host has all the skills needed to be a skillful cuck

you know what, don't apologize. i think i needed those two months to finally try to properly put stuff together.

like i still don't think i necessarily agree but i think i fully get the argument now