anethum wrote
i.... i think i kinda sorta get it (pls don't get mad at me for trying to make sense of the nonsense)???
i think the second part of the statement is easier; like, i can make the leap on how someone could insist that "being dominant" and "having all the skills of a gameshow host" have associative property (though it's not true? i can accept a skilled gameshow host necessarily being dominant but not really the opposite). connecting it to the "cuck" part is an even bigger leap for me though
if this didn't help i hope i made it more confusing
twovests OP wrote
sorry i missed this earlier!!
what i mean is that a skillful cuck has all the skills needed to host a game show
but also, a game show host has all the skills needed to be a skillful cuck
anethum wrote
you know what, don't apologize. i think i needed those two months to finally try to properly put stuff together.
like i still don't think i necessarily agree but i think i fully get the argument now
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments