It has that same magical "power" that functional languages have. I can put expressions in places that shouldn't be possible.
Working on a toy language, I threw an expression in curly braces, i.e. for x in {...}, which returned a different iterator depending on a condition. It really helped me cut down on code re-use (which was really good for my dev experience). That "clicked" in an extremely satisfying way.
I haven't used an Instapot, but I have the Aroma rice cooker / steamer. It certainly cookers my rice. I got it because it was cheaper, I don't know if it's better.
I've heard good things about the Zojirushi rice cooker, and I can attest that their thermos is very good. I'd consider Zojirushi if I were in your shoes.
But yeah, tunable lasers cost a lot of money. Like, price-not-listed-call-us-for-a-quote prices. As I understand, argon ion lasers could emit most of the frequency spectrum.
Definitely going to revisit this thread if I happen to run into someone who knows more lol
This is what a laser does, through "stimulated emission" (i am not joking, that is what it's called) of electromagnetic radiation!
Also look into "masers" or "spasers".
But other than that, no idea. I speculate it's really difficult to do that within the ~500 terahertz frequency (visible light?) Wifi radiation is at ~5 gigahertz and radios are at ~kilohertz.
All the light emitters I know of use fixed-frequency emitters. Phoshpors, etc.
twovests wrote
Reply to Rust has an incredibly steep learning curve but it's a neat language. by flabberghaster
I also share these feelings!
It has that same magical "power" that functional languages have. I can put expressions in places that shouldn't be possible.
Working on a toy language, I threw an expression in curly braces, i.e.
for x in {...}
, which returned a different iterator depending on a condition. It really helped me cut down on code re-use (which was really good for my dev experience). That "clicked" in an extremely satisfying way.