Recent comments in /f/killallgames
twovests wrote
Reply to please retweet my video game industry takes that are several years out of date by voxpoplar
agreed take
toasthaste wrote
Reply to please retweet my video game industry takes that are several years out of date by voxpoplar
this take is still piping hot unfortunately
ShiningWing wrote
Reply to please retweet my video game industry takes that are several years out of date by voxpoplar
This is a great take
cute_spider_ni_srsly wrote
Reply to please retweet my video game industry takes that are several years out of date by voxpoplar
that is a good take, sadly "doesn't really use twitter" is a major component of my brand
cute_spider_ni_srsly wrote
Reply to comment by devtesla in Gamemaster Anthony Reviews Ready Player One by Presidential_Afro
wow okay jeez
devtesla wrote
Reply to comment by cute_spider_ni_srsly in Gamemaster Anthony Reviews Ready Player One by Presidential_Afro
DONT
cute_spider_ni_srsly wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by neku in Gamemaster Anthony Reviews Ready Player One by Presidential_Afro
im gonna be mean >:-]
neku wrote
I hope that people are nice to gamemaster anthony.
Not a blockbuster to change the face of cinema like the Marvel Cinematic Universe has, but a fun little flick to watch.
Gamemaster anthony I hope people are nice to you
Moonside wrote
Reply to comment by rizzines in Dodge fireballs forever in a neural net's Doom nightmare by voxpoplar
I sort of view this kind of thing as a bit pointless since the purpose of gaming is fun and just making AI better has been so far a bad way of making it happen. It's more of an interesting thing, something I'd watch from afar rather than see as good for gaming.
hollyhoppet wrote
Reply to comment by rizzines in Dodge fireballs forever in a neural net's Doom nightmare by voxpoplar
I mean, it's not there yet but this type of algorithm could eventually be applied to video game monsters. Pretty wild stuff.
rizzines wrote
Ooh open source :o
I was hoping it'd be a thing where you could play Doom but with the monsters having neural net smarts, and learning from you. But this too is cool.
rizzines wrote
Reply to auron from final fantasy x is hot by voxpoplar
pic pl-
he
nvm
Moonside wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
Sorry, The Journal of Sonic Studies is real though.
Actually jfc there are so many scientific conferences it's mindboggling
twovests OP wrote
Reply to comment by voxpoplar in Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
Ooh this is useful. I was thinking of working around a physics engine but I might just end up writing me own for 2D, using the sonic physics guide.
The big thing is I'm worried about fuckiness with infinitesimally flat 2D meshes that don't use the extra 3rd dimension tbh.
voxpoplar wrote
Reply to comment by twovests in Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
These are really for understanding calculations from 8- and 16-bit consoles so may not be what you're looking for but still might help you understand how to get certain feels down hopefully.
Sonic Physics Guide. High-ish level overview of how physics calculations work for Sonic.
Mario Physics Guide. Lower level detail guide to SMB physics in all its hexadecimal glory.
twovests OP wrote
Reply to comment by voxpoplar in Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
I'm interested in the ones you find the most informative! Especially those that can deal with not-sprites. (I'm not gonna be in 3D but I am gonna have vectors so it's like 3D but with 2 dimensions? is there a word for that? i should know that right?)
twovests OP wrote
Reply to comment by Moonside in Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
huh this is a real thing
but no hedhehogs;;;((((
rizzines wrote (edited )
Reply to indie 3D Sonic by voxpoplar
edit: Whoah, it looks more interesting than Sonic.
voxpoplar wrote
Reply to Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
I dunno but I could link you to detailed articles about how the physics in sonic work
Moonside wrote
Reply to Are there gamedev journals like there are scientific journals? I want to do a lit review before I make my weird platformer by twovests
I recommend The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Sonic Studies
hitto wrote
Reply to auron from final fantasy x is hot by voxpoplar
he's okay
voxpoplar OP wrote
toasthaste wrote
Reply to comment by hollyhoppet in While we're talking about Sea of Thieves, Microsoft offers a 14 day free trial of a $10/month service that lets you play sea of thieves and a bunch of other microsoft games by hollyhoppet
WELL THEN WELL THEN WELL THEN
hollyhoppet OP wrote (edited )
Reply to comment by toasthaste in While we're talking about Sea of Thieves, Microsoft offers a 14 day free trial of a $10/month service that lets you play sea of thieves and a bunch of other microsoft games by hollyhoppet
i don't have one either it's on pc too
Moonside wrote
Reply to please retweet my video game industry takes that are several years out of date by voxpoplar
Who the fuck is nostalgic for 90's game reviews? Besides, they're not coming back anymore, kids have moved on from the format and embrace other kinds of barely disguised advertising nowadays.
Also the attitude presented in the comic is such a thin skinned one. Honestly, it doesn't even look any kind of a devolution to me if it were an accurate depiction. I absolutely do find "Why X is Feminist/Not Feminist" pieces absolutely dreary to read most of the time, it feels such a reductive approach. But that hardly describes any major video game journalism outlet. Pieces like these tend come from barely read blogs and perhaps a few liberal feminist authors, but the latter seem more present in TV, film and music criticism.
But what is mindboggling is presenting cheerleading consumer's choice, what ever it is, as a good one. There's nothing bad in critiquing a work harshly and a review that does just that won't necessary be harsh in tone. Today, I read Pauline Kael's review of Superman (1978). It is a very negative review, but there's no bitter snark to be found or insinuation that the reader's values are wrong if they disagreed with Kael's perspective. But I found it perfectly charitable, a bit disappointed in fact that the kids didn't get an exciting film. She sees some merit in the source comics despite seeing the art form as a "slang form of simplified storytelling" which while questionable was probably the received opinion among film critics in the 70's. One of her problems with Lois Lane in the film is that Christopher Reeves as Superman "outclasses her" and that the audience isn't "given clue to what our hero sees in Lois Lane." Again, this critique works because it's charitable enough. Faults seem larger when contrasted with some more successful aspect.