So, up front: All the game / probability / measure theory tells me I'll lose money gambling. All the street smarts tells me the house has better mathematicians than me, and if I had better knowledge of the game than they did, they'd figure that out and shut me out before I put a dent in their wallet.
But most people either (1) don't have that knowledge integrated into their actions, or (2) have a nonlinear cost function w.r.t. money they gain and lose.
Now... I love doing things like opening new bank accounts for $400 or opening new credit cards for $300. People call this "churning" or "beer money".
Now, I'm seeing promos like "Bet $5, get $200 in bonus bets."
For instance, if there are 50/50 odds with 49% payouts, that's (205) / (1/2) * 0.49 - 5 = $200
expected profit. Pretty nice.
I'm assuming the point is that DraftKings et al will lose money on that in the short run, but gain money by getting gamblers in the door, addicted to the flashing lights.
I'm not worried at all that I will become addicted to gambling. To me, this looks like a good way to make a quick buck, while taking money away from an evil organization.
TLDR: "Bet $5 get $200 in free bets" seems like a good deal if I don't place any bets after. Am I missing a catch?
twovests OP wrote
By "nonlinear cost function", I mean scenarios where the dollars gained are worth more than those lost, or scenarios with quantifiable factors other than dollars gained and lost.
I've gambled four times in my life under a nonlinear cost function:
Need 4 Pee: Bladder 'bout to blast, I hid myself away into a Boston Bodega, begging for the bathroom. "For customers only," said the sign, and the cheapest product was a $2 scratch off. I paid, peed, and knew my winnings: One trip to the bathroom. This was nonlinear because I was going to pee.
Not going to finish that? Years ago, I went to a casino with a friend, and having had never used the machines before, I wanted to try them out. I had $40. The experience was underwhelming, but someone had left cash in the machine and I win on my first bet. I ended up coming out with $100. This was nonlinear because (1) I was paying for the novel experience, and (2) I ended up getting free money.
Orange lining: This most recent election, I put some money on Trump. The thinking was this would hedge against layoffs a bit, and give me something to look forward to even in the worst case. I didn't put in a lot, maybe I should have? This was nonlinear because I expected dollars to be worth less if Trump won, and also for emotional reasons.
The 401K account counts too: Putting money into investment account is also gambling. But that employer match and tax incentive makes it nonlinear, even if you believe the economy is just a bubble.