i don't remember if this article was posted here but i feel like it intersects well on how the public sector subsidises energy projects without further thought into impact

but is history really mystory, i just don't know about things that existed before i came into existence /s

i don't disagree! i read the 'wood as not sustainable building material' article posted here only recently and there are more factors at play than i previously thought

xmas eve eve

google search "world's eepy-est cat"

the only reason it's not the 31st is because we are never open on sundays

i find i agree with you, especially with the outsize influence his blog held/holds. the underlying point about successful suicide rates linked with gun ownership is something that stays on my mind though

los estados unidos mexicanos welcomes new mexico as a state!

nyeh

where does that leave new mexico?

the org the writer collaborated with has a good primer on how to speak with survivors of gun violence (speaking as someone's who lost a loved one to gun violence)

i remember reading about this!! when the london eye first opened. i think my cousins went

that uae minister on the same side as corporations

oh my god!

"Crowther, who says his message was misinterpreted, put out a more nuanced paper last month, which shows that preserving existing forests can have a greater climate impact than planting trees."

i think it was an easy buy-in for big corps

so beautifully done

oh maple, i pined something on teaktalk and they called me oud

a: it's illogical for 6 to fear 7 as there is no basis

b: no, no, no. don't you know that 7 8 9 ?