Submitted by twovests in programming (edited )
gimp has an awful name. this is what gimp users actually believe:
The GIMP has been around under that name for going on 20 years. Its user base has grown exponentially worldwide, and the tool kit itself is standing on the brink of a quantum leap in capabilities. I see no signs that its name, which has positive brand recognition across a very large community of users, has held back the GIMP's market penetration in the least. At this time, a name change would be actively harmful to long established organic promotion that works very well.
fork idea: it's called "CocaCola: A Product for All Of Us". it's actually a very long acronym and not related to the delicious CocaCola beverage line at all :)
(edit: i use this program, i am a gimp user)
cute_spider_ni_srsly wrote (edited )
The GIMP name helps the project associate two basic ideas in its user's minds,
So when I hear the project called GIMP, my mental association with that project is "Broken, unintelligent, creepy". As such, I keep with the less feature-rich (and also badly named for virtually opposite reasons) Paint.Net.
Then, I remember using the GIMP software in college and I do remember that it was difficult to use and telling people about it getting me weird looks. So that helps reinforce "broken, unintelligent, creepy". It's just not a good name for 2018!
What if you called it Hassy? Is Hassy a good name?