Recent comments in /f/articles
hollyhoppet wrote
Reply to [general cw/explicit images of botched surgeries/misogyny] These Cancer Patients Wanted to Get Rid of Their Breasts for Good. Their Doctors Had Other Ideas. by neku
i didn't read this, just wanted to say having had a botched surgery, thank you very much for the content warning
Moonside OP wrote
Reply to comment by hollyhoppet in The Oscar Wilde of YouTube fights the alt-right with decadence and seduction by Moonside
You should like watch her videos in reverse chronological order whenever you can, she's like the best political content creator on YouTube.
hollyhoppet wrote
i've never heard of her wow this woman sounds amazing
Moonside wrote
I didn't realize that this was by the mcmansionhell author now I gotta actually read this!! and not just think "same"
Moonside wrote
Reply to this paper proposes preventing bug exploits by adding thousands of non-exploitable bugs to programs by mm_
I'm a big fan of how this seems like a total joke.
noordinaryspider wrote (edited )
Reply to [tw suicide] Police Broke Into Chelsea Manning’s Home with Guns Drawn — in a “Wellness Check" by neku
"Wellness checks" are like that. Many perfectly decent people in less-marginalized circumstances aren't aware of this fact and genuinely think they are helping. Other times----well, it can be like SWATing.
Video isn't working for me so Imma go look for text. I hope Chelsea's okay...well, as okay as anyone can be. :(
ETA: https://www.advocate.com/transgender/2018/6/05/wellness-check-chelsea-manning-involved-armed-police
tl/dr: She wasn't home when the incident happened, fortunately.
musou wrote (edited )
Reply to nice article against Popper's falsificationism by mm_
Popper's falsificationist strategy of conjectures and refutations can only deliver negative knowledge. It shows certain scientific theories are false, but it never shows that any theory is true.
i don't understand why he calls this a flaw. refuting positivism was one of the main purposes of popper's argument (as i understand it, anyway). in both of the counterexamples he brings up-- that smoking cigarettes causes lung cancer and that matter is made of atoms-- neither needs to be strictly capital-t True in order for us to be able to apply those theories to make useful predictions about the world. in fact neither statement is capital-t True in the sense accepted by most skeptics. plenty of people smoke cigarettes and never develop lung cancer, and no one has directly observed an atom via their senses. Popperian falsificationism has a lot of implications about the nature of knowledge revealed by scientific methods but i don't necessarily think those implications are so disagreeable as to render his argument unusable. in fact i think we might be better off if this kind of understanding of the nature of scientific theories were more widespread.
noordinaryspider wrote
Reply to nice article against Popper's falsificationism by mm_
Nice! TFS and very relevant, both historically and personally.
neku wrote
Reply to nice article against Popper's falsificationism by mm_
thought this was about poppers. i was about to get REAL gay in here
neku OP wrote
Reply to comment by hollyhoppet in Seymour Hersh on spies, state secrets, and the stories he doesn’t tell by neku
i want to hear the stories seymour doesnt tell.
hollyhoppet wrote
i read this as "seymour harsh on spies etc etc" at first and thought of seymour the tumblr ape/monkey
anand wrote
Reply to "YouTube comments on TED videos are more polarized for female presenters with more of both positive and negative replies" by mm_
more positive replies is a bit of a pleasant surprise, at least?
hollyhoppet wrote
Reply to "YouTube comments on TED videos are more polarized for female presenters with more of both positive and negative replies" by mm_
wow what a surprise
Moonside wrote
Is this a devolution derby?
RefloodTheFens wrote
Reply to Home Office destroyed proof that could have spared Windrush generation from deportation by neku
this is fucking appalling. not only is the border a violent set of institutions that will never forget if you crossed it, but it will also willingly forget the circumstances of that crossing, so as to treat all instances as 'suspect' and in need of policing.
mm_ wrote
thanks this was interesting
Moonside OP wrote
Reply to Humankind’s Most Important Material by Moonside
It's glass, btw.
emma wrote
Reply to I am a “MasterChef” survivor by neku
[...] someone missed that I never sent back the signed contract.
Imagine if Kyubey did this.
noordinaryspider wrote
Reply to [general cw/explicit images of botched surgeries/misogyny] These Cancer Patients Wanted to Get Rid of Their Breasts for Good. Their Doctors Had Other Ideas. by neku
So sorry Holly. I can only imagine, but of course I do. It's not if but when since I have this body that is flipping out enough over meno and my mom had a botched surgery and my grandmother....
Well, they'll just write "alcoholism" or "exposure" on my death certificate at this point because who cares but before they do I wanted to vent my rage at doctors in general. I didn't just want to go flat, I wanted to go HONEST!!!! I wanted to go FULL ON FEARLESS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSZAIYOKHLg
and just tell them to take out the cancer, take off the nipples, leave the scars, and let me take off my flipping shirt legally when it gets hot out and say, "This is what breast cancer survivors look like."
Yea, well little thirteen year old idealistic hippie chicks don't always get what they want.
Pass me that bottle of brandy.