Submitted by twovests in vote_satan
I wrote a 1400 word post, and then a 670 word post, etc. I can't write this post without yapping!
Most of the post is just trying to re-iterate "hey, we all still agree that there is no such thing as white people, for these reasons", and "also, the ideology of 'white people' implicitly supports white supremacy."
All of that just to derive the verbiage that "white supremacy identifies me as white", or "I'm identified as white" for short, is how I would feel most comfortable identifying.
"White people don't exist" as a literally true statement seemed to be discussed pretty often ever since I was politically aware. It seemed like a bog-standard social justice understanding, alongside "reverse racism doesn't exist". I saw it when I became a card-carrying SJW in the early 2010s, then again in 2015 with BLM, then again in 2020 with BLM again.
But belief in white people seems at an all time high and there seems to be no appetite for denying the existence of a White People any more. This is concerning, since the existence of a White People is really really crucial for white supremacy, and white supremacist nationalists are in control of the US government now.
I feel like, now more than ever, it's really really important to qualify that white people literally don't exist, every time it comes up.
So...
Is that qualification necessary? Do I sound incomprehensible? Am I "the friend who is too woke"? Or is "white people don't exist" a statement everyone already agrees on, so much so that it's not worth even bringing up?
neku wrote (edited )
i think its correct to say that the concept of whiteness is constructed based on the necessities of western imperialism. i think you can see that when you think about the borders of whiteness, eg anti-slavic rhetoric, white jewishness, anti-italian/spanish/greek racism due to their darker tones despite their european background (and position within european imperialism), etc. but i think that its also correct to say that white people as a category exist. i think its productive to highlight the contradictions in the ingroup/outgroup identification of whiteness and emphasise that whiteness is extremely heterogeneous in terms of genetics, background, etc. but i think it doesnt help that in your post you dont really elaborate on what you mean when you say "white people dont exist". like, at all? as a category? as a descriptor? as a race? i understand that you're thinking about white people in the Karen/Barbara Fields Racecraft social construct sense but not expanding on that in your writing means that your point isn't coming across