Submitted by flabberghaster in just_post

But our company is really pushing for everyone to use AI more for everything, so it's only going to get worse.

Seriously it's so bad, the code these things pump out mostly seems to work but it has such basic errors and is so sloppy, I'd be embarrassed to push it for review. It makes me honestly think they have no idea what they're doing, but some of these are people who've been in the field for years and they do seem to know at least something.

Did AI dependence rot their brains? Are they just getting sloppy? Or did they always just suck but floated by anyway?

8

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

flabberghaster OP wrote

He literally replied to some of my comments pointing out mistakes with "yeah sorry some of this is copilot fluff."

I'm going to commit a crime.

6

twovests wrote

It's so damn rude and disrespectful. They couldn't be assed to write the code, but they couldn't even be assed to READ it??

A reviewer should not be the first person to read the code!

6

twovests wrote

Do we work at the same company? Gun against my head, I've been espousing the virtues of AI, while secretly looking at the mountain of tech debt we're accruing as job security once the rug is pulled.

Realizing I am better than all of my colleagues at coding and recognizing mistakes makes me feel even more reassured.

When these tools do work decently, it's heavily citing markdown and comments I've written! Against the culture of my team (which uses Confluence, and sees documentation as something to generate).

I bet these will still get "better" but as I use these, I can't believe THIS is what all the people on HackerNews are jerking over.

5